Embedded Files
Criteria for submissions
The programme committee will evaluate submissions based on the criteria below. The criteria are slightly different for each type of contribution.
1) Criteria for good practice presentations
Abstracts should address:
Context from which good practice is drawn
Relevance to ‘blurring old lines’ and/or ‘building new bridges’
Brief summary of what the good practice involves
Why this is a good / original practice
Why it is relevant for the audience, i.e. learning points / relevance for others
2) Criteria for research presentations
Abstracts should address:
Context in which research was carried out
Relevance to ‘blurring old lines’ and/or ‘building new bridges’
Methodological approach
Key findings (or provisional findings)
Implications for practice
3) Criteria for practical workshops
Abstracts should address:
What the workshop is about
Relevance to ‘blurring old lines’ and/or ‘building new bridges’
Who would benefit from participating in the workshop
Roughly how the workshop will be approached, e.g. How will you activate the audience?
Why it is relevant for the audience, i.e. What can participants expect to learn or gain from the workshop?
4) Criteria for posters or multimedia presentations
Abstracts should address:
Context in which research or good practice was carried out
Relevance to ‘blurring old lines’ and/or ‘building new bridges’
Methodological approach (research) or brief summary of what the good practice involves
Findings in brief (research), or explanation of why this is a good practice
Implications of research for practice, or transferability of good practice to other practical contexts
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse